| |
|
Frequently
Asked Questions
|
|
on
|
|
Shri
Rama Janmabhoomi Movement
|
| |
|
Compiled by
: Ashok Chowgule and Dr. Shiva Subramanya.
|
| |
|
1s. Summary
of the evidence proving destruction of Shri Rama Janmabhoomi temple
in 1528 AD
|
|
This Annexure gives the summary of the evidence provided
by the Vishwa Hindu Parishad in December 1990 to the government
of India. This evidence was compiled in context of the discussions
organised by the Chandrashekar government, and the moot point then
was: Is there proof that an old and persistent tradition among Shri
Rama devotees has considered the site as the sacred Shri Rama Janmabhoomi,
and that Shri Rama worship ttok place there in a temple, before
and until the Babri structure was built? It has also been published
by the VHP, and many have written about the points made therein.
The evidence establishes the vandalism at the Shri Rama Janmabhoomi
site in 1528 AD.
|
|
The full evidence is available at the following
websites:
|
|
http://www.hvk.org/specialrepo/rjm/index.htm
|
|
As a response to a White Paper prepared by the Narsimha
Rao government in February 1993, the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP)
brought out its own document in April 1993. The section relating
to the evidence of the Shri Rama Janmabhoomi temple not only gives
a summary of the evidence, but also includes comments made by the
Government of India on the submissions made by the VHP. While the
government comments have not been made public, the BJP's White Paper
is in the public domain. To the best of our knowledge the BJP's
reproduction of government notes have not been denied.
|
|
The relevant section is available at the following
websites: http://www.hvk.org/ram/a8.htm
|
|
The full White Paper of the BJP is available at
the following websites:
|
|
http://www.hvk.org/specialrepo/bjpwp/index.htm
|
|
The evidence provided by the VHP was divided into
five parts. The first part dealt with the Hindu testimony. The city
of Ayodhya has undeniably been a city of great antiquity and a sacred
spot to the Hindus for a long time.
|
|
Valmiki's Ramayana gives the location as on the bank
of river Saryu, and describes its area, prosperity and glory. Many
puranas attest the fact that Ayodhya is considered as one of the
six holy cities, the other five being Mathura, Haridwar, Kashi,
Kanchi and Ujjain. In all the Hindu scriptures, Ayodhya figures
prominently and Shri Rama is referred to as an avatar of Vishnu.
|
|
Kalidasa, the greatest classical poet and dramatist,
gives a narrative of Vishnu's incarnation on earth as Shri Rama.
There is not a single important poet or writer in classical Sanskrit
literature who has not paid his best obeisance to Shri Rama in one
form or another.
|
|
For the last two millennia, the tradition of veneration
to Shri Rama has existed in the Hindu society in one form or another.
The earliest known inscription to testify to this is found in the
Nashik cave inscription dating back to 150 AD. The evolution of
the tradition of Shri Rama worship at least from 300 AD is established
by the early shrines surviving at ancient Ramgiri hills, 30 kms
from Nagpur. Paintings depicting episodes of Shri Rama's life have
adorned the walls of numerous temples in India and outside - from
the famous Deogarh temple in Madhya Pradesh to Angkor Vat in Cambodia.
The Grand Palace in Bangkok has a pictorial depiction of the complete
Ramayan along the inner part of the compound wall.
|
|
The merits of a devote observing the vow on Ramnavami
(the day Shri Rama was born) has been described in Ayodhya-Mahatmya
in the following words: "A man who has seen the Janmasthana will
not be born again even if he does not offer gifts, practise asceticism,
goes on pilgrimages or make sacrifice-offerings. A man observing
the vow world will be liberated from the bondages of rebirth on
arrival of the Navami day because of the miraculous power of a bath
and a gift. By seeing the Shri Rama Janmabhoomi he shall obtain
the result that occurs to one who gives away a thousand red cows
day after day."
|
|
The second part dealt with the Muslim testimony.
Numerous Muslim writers have written detailed accounts of the regional
history of Awadh since the 17th century. Based on older authentic
contemporary sources of various nature, they aver to the fact that
the temple at the Ram Janmabhoomi was demolished and a mosque constructed
in its place. Some of these writers were residents of Awadh. We
give below five the twelve Muslim testimonies that were given as
part of the evidence in December 1990.
|
|
In Safiha-i Chahal Nasaih Bahadur Shahi, written
during the late 17th and early 18th century by the daughter of Bahadur
Shah Alamgir, it is stated as follows: "The places of worship of
the Hindus situated at Mathura, Banaras and Awadh, etc., in which
the Hindus have great faith - the place of the birthplace of Kanhaiya,
the place of Rasoi Sita, the place of Hanuman, who, according to
the Hindus, was seated by Ram Chandra over there after the conquest
of Lanka - were all demolished for the strength of Islam, and at
all these places mosques have been constructed."
|
|
Mirza Jan, in Hadiqa-i-Shahada (1856), says, "The
past Sultans encouraged the propagation and glorification of Islam
and crushed the forces of the unbelievers, the Hindus. Similarly,
Faizabad and Awadh were also purged of this mean practice of kufr.
(Awadh) was a great worshipping centre and the capital of (the kingdom
of) Rama's father.... The temple of Janmasthan was the original
birthplace of Ram, adjacent to which is Sita ki Rasoi..... Hence
at that site, a lofty mosque has been built by Babar Badshah under
the guidance of Musa Ashikan."
|
|
The Urdu novelist Mirza Rajab Ali Beg Surur (1787-1867),
in Fasana-i Ibrat, says, "During the reign of Babar Badshah, a magnificent
mosque was constructed in Awadh at a place which is associated with
Sita ki Rasoi. This was the Babri mosque."
|
|
The Tarikh-i Awadh by Sheikh Mohammed Azmat Ali Kakorwai
Nami (1869) states, "Awadh was the capital of the father of Laxman
and Ram. There, under the guidance of Musa Ashikan, a magnificent
Babri mosque was constructed at the site of the temple within the
premises of Janmasthan." In another book by the same title, but
written by Alama Muhammad Najamulghani Khan Rampuri (1909), it is
stated, "Babar built a magnificent mosque at the spot where the
temple of Janmasthan of Ramchandra was situated at Ayodhya."
|
|
In 1977, an English translation of Hindustan Islami
Ahad Mein by Maulana Hakim Sayid Abdul Hai (d. 1923), was published
by his son, Maulana Abdul Hasan Nadwi, alias Ali Mian. The book
contains a chapter "The Mosques of Hindusthan", giving at least
six instances of construction of the mosques on the very sites of
the Hindu temples demolished by the Muslim rulers during the 12th-17th
centuries. As regards, the Babri structure, he writes, "This mosque
was constructed by Babar at Ayodhya which the Hindus call the birthplace
of Ram Chanderji."
|
|
In the third part, European records were produced
which attest to the holiness of the Shri Rama Janmabhoomi site and
the destruction of a temple in 1528 AD. William finch, a European
traveller (1608-11), confirms the existence of the ruins of Ramkot,
the castle of Shri Rama, where Hindus believe he was born. Joseph
Tieffenthaler, the Austrian Jesuit priest (1766-71), reports that
Babur destroyed the Shri Rama Janmabhoomi temple and constructed
a mosque using some of its pillars. He also wrote that Hindus refused
to give up worship at the place, in spite of the Muslim efforts
to prevent them. He noted the existence of the Ram Chabootra in
the courtyard of the Babri structure, and celebration of Ram Navmi
with great gatherings of people from all over India.
|
|
All the British official records have accepted the
ancient Hindu belief of the holiness of Shri Rama Janmabhoomi site
and the destruction of a temple there. These records also mention
that the Babri structure was built after the destruction, and many
specifically mention the use of the pillars from the destroyed temple.
|
|
The Archaeological Survey of India (1934) identified
all the holy sites of Ayodhya with reference to the ancient texts,
numbered them and put up sign posts in stone to mark the sites.
The Babri structure was identified as the Shri Rama Janmabhoomi
and a signpost was embedded there saying: "Site no. 1: Janmabhoomi".
|
The court verdict of 1886 has been discussed in
details as answer to question number fourteen, and what is said
in Babur Nama (from the English translation by Annette Beveridge)
has been discussed in question numbers seven and eight. The Encyclopaedia
Brittanica (1978, 15th edition, Vol 1) records that a mosque erected
by Babur in 1528, on the site of an earlier temple, marks Shri
Rama's birthplace.
|
|
Hans Bakker, the Dutch scholar, in his comprehensive
study entitled "Ayodhya" (1984) has categorically accepted that
an old Vaishnava temple was situated on the holy spot where Hindus
believe Shri Rama was born. Bakker also says that this Janmabhoomi
temple was destroyed by Babur in 1528 AD and replaced with the Babri
structure. Fourteen black-stone pillars from the temple were utilised
by Mir Baqi in the construction of the mosque.
|
|
In the fourth part, the revenue records, Kot Ram
Chandra, the residential headquarters of Shri Rama has been shown
quite distinct from the city of Ayodhya. In the records, Janmasthan,
a large complex serves as a land mark in Kot Ram Chandra.
|
|
In the final part, the evidence with respect to archaeological
records is presented. In the period 1975-80, the Archaeological
Survey of India undertook a project to study the various sites mentioned
in the Ramayana. The combined evidence shows that there did exist
a historical basis for the Ramayana. Excavations were also done
at two places around the Babri structure. They established the existence
of pillar bases outside the structure, which were aligned in the
same direction as the pillars in the structure, and the distance
between the bases outside and the pillars inside were the same.
These excavations also showed that the site was occupied prior to
7th century BC, that is for nearly 3000 years. The pillars that
were present in the Babri structure had distinctive Hindu features,
establishing the existence of a temple prior to the construction
of the Babri structure.
|
|
Two Hindu structures of importance that existed within
the Babri structure were the Ram Chabootra and Sita-ki-Rasoi. The
former was a small raised platform, with a canopy, where constant
prayers for Lord Ram were being conducted. Joseph Tiffenthaler,
the Austrian Jesuit priest, who stayed in Awadh in 1766-71 reported
that the Hindus had constructed the Ram Chabootra in the Babri structure's
courtyard. He also reported that the Hindus practised their devotion
at the Chabootra, and continued to celebrate Ram Navami with great
gatherings of people from all over India. This clearly shows the
importance of the site to the Hindus, and they were willing to take
huge risks to establish their presence. Please also see the answer
to question number ten.
|
|
The demolition of the Babri structure on December
6, 1992, brought to light a great deal of archaeological material
from within the thick walls of the Babri structure. Besides sculptured
panels and images, architectural components such as amalaka, sikharas,
doorjambs, etc., it included three inscriptions on stone. The largest
one, inscribed on a 1.10x.56 meter slab and consisting of 20 engraved
lines, has been published by Professor Ajaya Mitra Shastri of Nagpur
University in the Puratattva (a reputed scholarly journal of the
Indian Archaeological Society), No. 23 (1992-93), pp. 35 ff. (Professor
Shastri is a distinguished historian and a specialist in epigraphy
and numismatics.) The relevant part of his paper reads its follows:
|
|
"The inscription is composed in high-flown Sanskrit
verse, except for a small portion in prose, and is engraved in the
chaste and classical Nagari script of the eleventh-twelfth century
AD. It was evidently put up on the wall of the temple, the construction
of which is recorded in the text inscribed on it. Line 15 of this
inscription clearly tells us that a beautiful temple of Vishnu-Hari,
built with heaps of stone (sila-sam hati-grahais) and beautified
with a golden spire (hiranya-kalasa-srisundaram) unparalleled by
any other temple built by earlier kings (purvvuirapyakritam kritam
nripatibhir) was constructed. This wonderful temple (aty-adhutam)
was built in the temple-city (vibudh- alayni) of Ayodhya situated
in the Saketamandala (district, line 17) showing that Ayodhya and
Saketa were closely connected. Saketa being the district of which
Ayodhya was a part. Line 19 describes god Vishnu as destroying king
Bali (apparently in the Vamana manifestation) and the ten-headed
personage (Dasanana i.e. Ravana)."
|
| |
|
|
|
|